




The Car
This is an essay I wrote in 1992 and submitted to a then recurring column in the New York Times Magazine, entitled His. Which were perspectives on life from a men's viewpoint. On alternating weeks, the column was entitled Hers.
The car has never played a meaningful role in my life. Though I now own one, it is a possession devoid of passion. The extent of expectations from the arrangement, is that it get me from point “A” to point “B” in reasonable comfort and safety. This aloofness is actually a marked improvement over my previous position in the matter.
In the 60’s, I was almost militantly anti-car. Being a native New Yorker who watched his city become increasingly noisy, dirty, overcrowded and unaffordable, the car —to my Age-of-Aquarius sensibilities—was just one more blight on the scene. Though in retrospect, my stance was not simply a product of ecological or sociological convictions. It was at least in part, a residue of regret for the absence of a common rite of passage from my life.
At age sixteen, when most kids first experience that heady feeling of a freedom that comes from getting a license and borrowing the “old man’s wheels,” economics, and indeed the very absence of an old man on the premises (let alone a car), tended to dampen any hopes I might have had on this front. And as my high school did not include a hands-on Drivers Ed program, (hell, it wasn’t even co-ed) my first associations with the car, were never naturally rooted.
At some point well after my seventeenth birthday, a sympathetic uncle did step in to try to fill the void. His heart was in the right place, his car wasn’t. He lived somewhere in the wilds of New Jersey, and the distantance between us proved insurmountable in trying to schedule lessons. And as my permit expired, so too did my desire to learn how to drive. This in turn, not only cut me off from a de rigueur adolescent experience but was a hindrance to enjoyment of related pastimes as well. It is not difficult to surmise that the sexual awakenings that often occurred in that den of iniquity, The Back Seat, were experiences lost to me during the formative years. Lost too, though hardly on a par with backseat bliss, was the visceral pleasure that guys seem to get from being hip to the minutia of car stats and data. To this day, I could not tell you the make, model and year of an approaching car, if it ran me over. Save for obvious differences in color, they all tend to look alike to me.
Five years would pass, as my disenfranchisement with the car would continue. Then at the urging of a girlfriend from “The Island” with access to her father’s grungy car, I agreed to take a second stab at trying to overcome, what had now developed into almost an obstinacy about getting a license. But this effort too, was doomed to failure. I cannot think of anything more ill-conceived than a man, having a woman with whom he is intimately involved, try to teach him how to drive. Freud would have had a field day with this one. The particulars are unimportant, other than to say it was a contest marked by name calling, pettiness, defensiveness and sexual tension. Not surprisingly, I came away from the experience without a license. And… without a girlfriend.
This estrangement between man and machine would last for another decade. As a sidebar to all of this, when put under the gun as to why I didn’t drive, I would offer a smattering of celebrities in my defense, who were similarly “afflicted”: Alfred Hitchcock, Tony Bennett, Jimmy Breslin, Gloria Steinem and Father O’Brien, the parish priest. Empirical evidence that I was not some sort of social misfit or total loser. But finally, at the advanced age of 32, almost by accident (no pun intended), I made peace with this…thing, and got a license.
I was stage managing a play in Greenwich Village during which in the course of its run, the cast and crew would go out afterwards for a bite each night. Then a good friend in the group, would drive me home. One evening, though fully aware of my “affliction,” he offhandedly asked me if I would like to drive. Without hesitation— and perhaps filled with the bravado and good cheer that comes from theater life— I said sure. After about five minutes of navigating his Cadillac, the size of a gondola, throughout the Venetian streets of the village— in the dark— and without incident, I rhetorically asked aloud: “Why don’t I don’t this.” To my surprise, there was no longer an answer. After a few weeks of post-midnight driving lessons, in a big car on small streets, it came to pass that I had finally joined the ranks of Driverhood. All that was missing was a tap on each shoulder with a sword.
A recounting of this story over the years, has invariably elicited expressions of disbelief. Especially here in L.A., a city whose unbridled love for the automobile is legendary, if not fetishistic. The male psyche, in particular, cannot comprehend how one could willingly practice vehicular celibacy for so long. Especially as the car has so permeated our culture and way of life: “See the USA, in your Chevrolet…” once sang Dinah Shore.
I remember soon after the start of the War in the Gulf (aka “Desert Storm”), USA Today, in profiling the suddenly famous Patriot missile, stated that at 17 feet 5 inches long, it was three inches longer than a Cadillac Sedan de Ville. As though this was the most universal and illuminating context in which to put this sort of data. Naturally, this presumed illumination left me in the dark.
Perhaps in the dark is where I’ll stay. It is unlikely that I’ll do anything dramatic to ever get up to speed (again, no pun intended) on this car stuff. It’s not just the implicit futility of teaching an old dog new tricks. My personal history has shown me to be, if nothing else, a late bloomer. It’s just that there always seems to be a more pressing matter. To wit: I’m currently more interested in the motor skills of my children than those of my engine. Although, don’t I owe it to myself one of these days to at least find out just how many miles to the gallon I’m getting?

The Me Issue
Most of us have been told at some point or other in our lives… “It’s not about you.” A stark reminder, that there are things, believe it or not, that are bigger than you; more important than you. That the world does not revolve around you. All true. Except... on your birthday. When it is about you; a day to celebrate you. A day to indulge in the “youness” of you.
This is an innate sense that children have. A belief that invariably extends far beyond day of birth. To which, any parent of a child, or person around children, can attest. But even throughout adulthood, I’ve always viewed birthdays, as something special. A day that was about me.
I’d take the day off from work, when possible. Later often arranging to make it possible, when I’d been fortunate to reach an executive position in a career in advertising. A career choice greatly influenced by noting the success a cousin seemed to be having as something called a Media Buyer at a large ad agency in town (town being New York of course).
He'd been "comped" tickets to the Beatles at Shea Stadium and had taken me along. Premium seats! A college student at the time and in pursuit of a more general BBA, that sealed the deal for me. Free Beatles tickets to an event of a lifetime? Advertising? I’m in!
As for the concert itself, during the mere 40 minutes that they were on stage the screaming never stopped. I really could hear very little of what they were singing beyond I Want to Hold Your Hand, but it didn’t matter. It was about the being there. And I was there. Just three days after my 20th birthday, to boot. To which I’ve ever since, tied this legendary Beatles "concert" to.

Double that time, and my 40th birthday was also memorable. I was greeted by a surprise party which was no surprise really, as I had surmised what was about to happen upon arriving home. Given the various parked cars in proximity to the house that were never there on this obscure street.
As we were anticipating the birth of our first child within a couple of months, I remember thinking that when she (or he) was 40, I would be 80. A big unfathomable, 8-O! A number, which sadly, far too many friends and family would never reach.
And now, God willing (and at what age do the "God Willing Years" begin, I've often wondered?), on August 20th of this month, I will have doubled that number again. Which is why this MuseLetter is dated 8/20/2025, and why I self-importantly introduce it as “The Me Issue.” And at 80, Me does have some issues. Which I’ll keep between me and my therapist.
While I've invariably touched on personal experiences and perspectives over these past 21 years in the writing and constructing of these Muses, this issue is exclusive in that regard. It borders in spots, on memoir. Interspersed with relatively short ekphrastic-like poems. Which are poems inspired by art or photos, or the other way around. More and more I have tended to marry poems to illustrations or some graphic treatment. These poems touch on implicit life moments, in that way that all poetry is implicit when you get down to it. Even if you are not up to it.
Finally, on this whole birthday business, it really has been taken to an existential level for me when I came upon a startling stat.
I’ve often wrapped my head around all the coincidences, aye the improbabilities, that need to happen before one is ever to see the light of day. Not all that long ago, I Googled to see if a number had ever been estimated on the odds of being born. A piece in the Huffington Post, put that number at about 1-in-400 trillion!!! (And I have done a piece on the excessive use of exclamation points in the current culture). In effect, we are all walking miracles. On that note, a Happy Birthday to all of you in advance. Thank you for your readership and “deletership.” Much appreciated!!!





Superman and Me
Like most kids back in the day, I first became aware of Superman through the comic books that were so prevalent at the time. The equivalent of today’s video game apps I suppose, in terms of their place in the pop culture. They were literally, the currency of exchange in my neighborhood. You could buy new or used comics from the local candy store, known by a nickname of “Jim Jim’s”. A 10-cent comic book could then be sold back to this eccentric proprietor for two cents. He also sold loose cigarettes to minors at two cents apiece, and I believe was arrested and hauled off one day for more serious charges.
But the subject is Superman. A hero to the youth of America ever since he first came on the scene. Which was by way of Action Comics in 1938. No I am not that old, but a trading card reproduction of that issue sits on a shelf in our bathroom. I even have a sense of nostalgia for things I imagined I experienced.

Being raised a Catholic (and still am after a hiatus from the church at one point for over thirty years), and what with nine years of parochial school—kindergarten through 8th grade—under my belt, I couldn’t help noticing early on, the similarities between Superman and Christ. In a tongue-in-cheek piece in a 2006 MuseLetter, I pointed out the similarities in the lives of these two superstars, that had struck me since I was about… nine? I mean, they are so obvious.

It’s not as if the Christ-like associations have gone unnoticed by others. In that same piece, I went on to note...he's back! Yet again. Superman Returns, starring newcomer Brandon Routh. This one is steeped in Christian allegory, what with Brando intoning (yes, Marlon has been “resurrected” for a posthumous performance— that’s how good an actor he is!) such prophetic lines as: “They only lack the light to show the way.” “I have sent them you, my only son.” And there’s that descending-through-space-in-the-Crucifixion-pose scene.
All of which is ironic when you consider that the genesis of the Superman character came out of the imaginations of a couple of Jewish guys from Cleveland. Jerry Siegal and Joe Shuster. They certainly had nothing religious in mind in its creation, grounded as it was, in a common social insecurity. Which Siegal noted once in an interview.
Clark Kent grew not only out of my private life, but also out of Joe Shuster's (the artist for Superman). As a high school student, I thought that someday I might become a reporter, and I had crushes on several attractive girls who either didn't know I existed or didn't care I existed. So it occurred to me: What if I was really terrific? What if I had something special going for me, like jumping over buildings or throwing cars around or something like that?
My first association with Superman "in the flesh" came by way of a weekly serial that played at the local movie house—15 episodes (or chapters as we called them)—one each Saturday in between the two feature films shown, and the countless cartoons.
You’d enter this roach-infested theater on Chatham Square at noon and wouldn’t emerge until dark. All the while seated in the Children’s Section no more than twelve feet from the screen. From which we would try to sneak into the adult seats, but were usually soon apprehended, and brought back to where we belonged. Only to repeat this cat and mouse game throughout our lengthy stay.
But my favorite viewing would come through TV when The Adventures of Superman starring George Reeves premiered in 1952. It was must-see TV for us. And I watched on a daily basis at 5PM when it ran in syndication. I loved it. But there was one disturbing episode in which our Superman, this savior of sorts, once shockingly did something of questionable moral unclarity. It went like this.
A couple of two-bit crooks, a man and woman (a blonde of course), discovered Superman’s costume in Clark Kent’s apartment. No dummies, they made the connection. Unlike everyone else who could be totally fooled by that pair of horn-rimmed glasses Kent always wore.
Uncertain of how to deal with it, Superman decides to take them atop an icy mountain and says to them, without any hint of human compassion, as seen in this subtitled video frame I got online...

I'll see you soon? Of course they try to escape. And in attempting to climb down the icy mountain, they slip and fall to their deaths. Seen as a young boy, I've never forgotten that episode. Crushing as it was. Some 40 years later, the memory of that scene inspired the concluding stanza of a poem I'd been writing.
You took me to places I had never been
then left me atop a mountain from which
I had no other option, but to learn how to fly.
Which readers of the poem have interpreted as an homage or compliment of sorts. A thank you. The exact opposite of the foul Superman deed I had in mind, though I was using it metaphorically.
Beyond George Reeves, many Supermen would follow. In a 2013 MuseLetter, upon seeing Man of Steel starring Heny Cavill, I took a stab at recounting all who had assumed the role up to that time.

When this latest incarnation came about last month, starring an actor I’d never heard of, David Corenswet, in a new Superman movie that was getting good reviews in that it was dealing with very current issues and eerily familiar political personas—and getting some pushback in some quarters for doing so—I decided to give it a shot.
This Superman is Supersensitive. No way he'd ever leave people on top of an icy mountain. Constantly in a state of doubt, he goes back to the state of Kansas. He needs the comforting reassurance of his aging foster parents, that he's really a good boy.
As human as it gets, he even has one of those all too familiar arguments one might have with a significant other. None other now, than Lois Lane, his girlfriend. (Who knew?).
In the meantime, he is getting his butt kicked frequently by forces as strong as he. And though this was not the apparent theme of the movie, my takeaway was that no matter how strong you are, you cannot not get by in this world, or in any alternative universe for that matter, without a little help from your friends. In this case, the Justice Gang. Comprised of other superheroes who repeatedly save his ass.
No, this is not my Superman. I have enough of my own angst to deal with. But Superman's dog Krypto? He stole the movie for me. Computer-generated though he was. And throughout, whenever he appeared, I thought of my Superdog of one time; a long-haired chihuahua we named Mick. After Jagger.

My long-term relationship with Superman, clearly, has gone to the dogs.



Quote of the Month
In the department of... hey, go quote yourself!




A Quadriptych of Aspiration



Ballplayer Writer Artist Actor
snapshot 1954 self-sonnet 1994 self illustration 6/6/66 photo as Ed Sullivan 2003



MuseLetter \’myüz-‘le-tər noun
1: a personal message, inspired by a muse of one's own creation, addressed to a person or organization, in the course of which, the sender becomes absorbed in thought; especially turning something over in the mind meditatively and often inconclusively.
2: a letter from a poet, or one who envisions oneself as such, in which he or she “muses” on that which is perceived to be news, or newsworthy, usually in some ironic or absurd way.
